← Back to Methodology
🏈

NFL Methodology

Why NFL Context Is Different

NFL careers are brutally short. The average career is 3.3 years. Players don't get the luxury of a 4-year development timeline — they need to produce quickly or they're replaced. This means immediate fit matters more than long-term potential.

A quarterback behind a bad offensive line doesn't get time to develop — he gets sacked, injured, and benched. Context isn't a modifier in the NFL; it's often the primary determinant of success.

The NFL Formula

Fit Score = (Team × 0.40) + (Position Dev × 0.25) + (Situation × 0.15) + (Player × 0.20)

NFL weighting emphasizes team environment heavily because the sport's violence and complexity mean players can't overcome bad situations through individual talent alone.

Context Factor Framework

The 10 factors we score for every draft pick:

FactorBase WeightData QualitySource
Head Coach Quality15%✅ GoodPro Football Reference
OC Rating10%🔨 BuildingOriginal Research
DC Rating10%🔨 BuildingOriginal Research
O-Line Quality12%⚠️ Mediumrbsdm.com EPA
Defensive Quality8%⚠️ Mediumrbsdm.com EPA
Skill Position Depth10%✅ GoodPFR Stats
Owner/FO Stability10%📊 SubjectiveRankings + Research
Draft Capital Position10%✅ ExcellentKaggle Dataset
Team Win% (prior year)5%✅ ExcellentPro Football Reference
Scheme Fit10%📊 SubjectiveOriginal Research

Position-Specific Weight Adjustments

Base weights shift based on what matters most for each position:

PositionO-LineOC/SchemeWeaponsQB QualityDC/Def Scheme
QB20%15%15%
RB25%15%
WR/TE15%15%
OL10%
DL/LB/DB15%

Development Modifier Formula

Each team has a historical track record at specific positions. This creates a multiplier:

Context Score = Base Pick Value × Development Modifier
Modifier > 1.0 = Team develops this position well
Modifier < 1.0 = Team historically fails at this position
Modifier = 1.0 = League average

High Modifiers (1.2+)

  • • Packers → QB (1.4)
  • • Steelers → WR (1.3)
  • • Ravens → LB (1.35)
  • • Cowboys → OL (1.25)

Low Modifiers (0.8-)

  • • Browns → QB (0.5) 1999-2017
  • • Patriots → WR (0.7)
  • • Raiders → QB (0.6)
  • • Bears → QB (0.65)

Team Environment (40%)

The largest factor — your supporting cast and coaching determine your ceiling.

Head Coach (10%)

  • Win % — Career and recent 3-year record
  • Tenure — Stability vs. hot seat pressure
  • Development History — Track record with rookies at position
  • Scheme Flexibility — Will they adapt to player's strengths?

Coordinator (12%)

  • Scheme Fit — Does their system match player's skills?
  • QB Development (for QBs) — How have previous QBs performed?
  • Play-Caller History — Aggressive? Conservative? Creative?
Example: Kyle Shanahan's system made Matt Ryan an MVP but requires specific QB traits. Scheme-dependent players thrive; others struggle.

Supporting Cast (12%)

  • O-Line Grade — Pass block win rate, run block grade
  • Skill Weapons — WR/TE/RB quality for QBs
  • QB Quality — For skill position players
  • Defensive Front — For defensive players

Ownership/Front Office (6%)

  • Stability — Coaching carousel history
  • Investment — Cap management, facility quality
  • Culture — Player-friendly? Dysfunction history?

Position Development History (25%)

This is our competitive advantage. We track every team's history developing specific positions over the past 15 years.

Position Graveyards

  • Browns QBs (1999-2017) — 0 Pro Bowlers in 18 years
  • Patriots WRs — N'Keal Harry, Chad Jackson, Aaron Dobson
  • Raiders 1st Round QBs — JaMarcus Russell legacy

Position Factories

  • Packers QBs — Favre → Rodgers → Love
  • Ravens LBs — Lewis, Suggs, Mosley
  • Steelers WRs — Ward, Brown, JuJu, Johnson

How We Calculate Position Dev Score

  • • Draft picks at position in last 15 years
  • • % that made Pro Bowl / All-Pro
  • • Average AV (Approximate Value) vs. league average
  • • Bust rate (out of league within 3 years)

Situational Factors (15%)

🎯

Draft Position Pressure (5%)

#1 picks get 2-3 year leashes. #32 picks get 5+ years. Higher picks face more scrutiny and shorter timelines to produce.

🏙️

Market Size (5%)

NYC/LA media pressure vs. Green Bay patience. Big markets amplify struggles; small markets allow quiet development.

📊

Team Mode (5%)

Win-now teams need immediate contributors. Rebuilding teams can afford patience. Mismatches hurt both.

Player Factors (20%)

The player's own traits that interact with their environment.

FactorWeightWhat It Measures
Pro Readiness8%Can they contribute Day 1? College system complexity, NFL-ready skills
Scheme Dependency6%Do they need a specific system? Versatile vs. specialized
Mental Makeup6%Handle adversity? Leadership? Work ethic reputation?

Position-Specific Weights

Different positions care about different factors:

PositionPrimary FactorSecondaryWhy
QBOC + O-LineHC stability, WeaponsCan't develop while getting sacked
RBO-Line + SchemeWorkload shareHoles matter more than legs
WRQB QualityTarget share, SchemeBest route runner means nothing with bad QB
TEScheme UsageQB, Blocking needsSome teams barely throw to TEs
OLOL CoachScheme fit, Unit qualityTechnique-dependent position
EDGEDC SchemeDL support3-4 vs 4-3 role difference
DTScheme FitRun D priority1-tech vs 3-tech matters
LBScheme RoleCoverage demandsModern LBs need coverage skills
CBCoverage SchemePass rush qualityMan vs zone specialists

NFL Data Sources

  • Player Value: Pro Football Reference Approximate Value (AV)
  • O-Line Grades: PFF pass block win rate, rbsdm.com EPA
  • Coaching Records: Pro Football Reference career data
  • Draft History: Pro Football Reference, Kaggle datasets
  • Coordinator History: Original research tracking every coordinator change

📋 Coordinator Database

Our proprietary dataset tracking 320+ coordinator-seasons from 2015-2024.

EXCLUSIVE
320+
Total Entries
10
Seasons (2015-2024)
32
Teams Tracked

Sample Data (2024 Season)

TeamHead CoachOCDC
KCAndy ReidMatt NagySteve Spagnuolo
SFKyle ShanahanHC Calls PlaysNick Sorensen
DETDan CampbellBen JohnsonAaron Glenn
PHINick SirianniKellen MooreVic Fangio
WASDan QuinnKliff KingsburyJoe Whitt Jr

🌳 Coaching Trees

We track how coaching philosophies spread through the NFL. This affects scheme fit predictions and helps identify which coordinators are likely to become head coaches.

🏈 Belichick

Defensive mastery, situational football

Vrabel, Flores, Patricia, Mayo...

🌲 Shanahan

Zone running, play-action, motion

McVay, LaFleur, McDaniel, Ryans...

🦅 Reid

West Coast + RPOs, creativity

Pederson, Nagy, Steichen, Sirianni...

🎬 McVay

Pre-snap motion, young offensive minds

O'Connell, Zac Taylor, Staley...
Explore interactive coaching trees →